1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1962 Mini MK I
To start off, 1962 Mini MK I is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 903 cc, 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Mini MK I (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 weights approximately 59 kg more than 1962 Mini MK I.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1962 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Lancia | Mini |
| Model | Ardea 3 | MK I |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2040 mm |
