1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1966 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1966 Maserati Mistral is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 591 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1966 Maserati Mistral | |
| Make | Lancia | Maserati |
| Model | Ardea 3 | Mistral |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 4014 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2410 mm |
