1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 236 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ardea 3 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2360 mm |
