1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1974 Triumph Toledo
To start off, 1974 Triumph Toledo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Triumph Toledo (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Triumph Toledo should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph Toledo weights approximately 214 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1974 Triumph Toledo | |
| Make | Lancia | Triumph |
| Model | Ardea 3 | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1296 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 63 L |
