1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 652 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lancia | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ardea 3 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2680 mm |
