1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Opel Ascona (74 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Ascona weights approximately 246 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Lancia | Opel |
| Model | Ardea 3 | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1297 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 70 L |
