1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1989 Mazda 626
To start off, 1989 Mazda 626 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1989 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Ardea 3 | 626 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1789 cc |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2580 mm |