1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (88 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 306 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lancia | Renault |
Model | Ardea 3 | Clio |
Year Released | 1946 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 50 L |