1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (177 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 431 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lancia | Renault |
| Model | Ardea 3 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 50 L |
