1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 903 cc, 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 126 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Lancia | Subaru |
| Model | Ardea 3 | R2 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 658 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 30 L |
