1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 511 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Lancia | Mazda |
| Model | Ardea 3 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 55 L |
