1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 2007 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2007 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volkswagen Polo (101 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 455 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 2007 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Lancia | Volkswagen |
| Model | Ardea 3 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1896 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 45 L |
