1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 1,908 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 761 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Lancia | Fiat |
Model | Ardea 3 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1946 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 1908 cc |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 58 L |