1946 Lancia Ardea 3 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. (28 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 777 kg more than 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Lancia Ardea 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Lancia Ardea 3 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Lancia | Volvo |
| Model | Ardea 3 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 2500 cc |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 674 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 60 L |
