1946 Maserati 6C vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 1,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Maserati 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho weights approximately 328 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Because 1946 Maserati 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Maserati 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Maserati 6C | 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
| Make | Maserati | Matra-Simca |
| Model | 6C | Rancho |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 804 kg | 1132 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |
