1946 Maserati 6C vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 1,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Maserati 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 11 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Maserati 6C | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Maserati | Smart |
| Model | 6C | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 804 kg | 815 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1820 mm |
