1946 Maserati 6C vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 3,994 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 921 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Because 1946 Maserati 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Maserati 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 1946 Maserati 6C has manual transmission. 1946 Maserati 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Maserati 6C | 2004 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Maserati | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 6C | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1493 cc | 3994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 804 kg | 1725 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2860 mm |
