1946 Maserati 6C vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati 6C would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 952 kg more than 1946 Maserati 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1946 Maserati 6C has manual transmission. 1946 Maserati 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Maserati 6C | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Maserati | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | CTS |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 804 kg | 1756 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |