1946 Maserati A6 vs. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati A6 would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 (192 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1946 Maserati A6. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1946 Maserati A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1946 Maserati A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Maserati A6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Maserati A6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Maserati A6 | 1989 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Maserati | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | A6 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 192 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1365 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |
