1946 Maserati A6 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati A6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1946 Maserati A6. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Maserati A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 367 kg more than 1946 Maserati A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Maserati A6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Maserati A6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Maserati A6 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Maserati | Mazda |
| Model | A6 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1242 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2650 mm |
