1946 Maserati A6 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Maserati A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Maserati A6 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1946 Maserati A6. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1946 Maserati A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 425 kg more than 1946 Maserati A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Maserati A6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Maserati A6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Maserati A6 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Maserati | Toyota |
Model | A6 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2601 mm |