1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 201 kg more than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V. (107 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Mercedes-Benz 170 V | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | 170 V | Clio |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 2946 cc |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2520 mm |
