1946 Peugeot 202 vs. 1964 Trabant Universal
To start off, 1964 Trabant Universal is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,133 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Peugeot 202 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 30 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Peugeot 202 weights approximately 132 kg more than 1964 Trabant Universal.
Because 1946 Peugeot 202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Peugeot 202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Trabant Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Peugeot 202 | 1964 Trabant Universal | |
Make | Peugeot | Trabant |
Model | 202 | Universal |
Year Released | 1946 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1133 cc | 594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 786 kg | 654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2030 mm |