1946 Peugeot 202 vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1983 Volvo 240 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 240 (81 HP @ 4650 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 520 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Peugeot 202 | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 202 | 240 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1133 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2660 mm |