1946 Peugeot 202 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 180 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Peugeot 202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Peugeot 202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Peugeot 202 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Peugeot | Renault |
Model | 202 | Clio |
Year Released | 1946 | 2006 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1133 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2690 mm |