1946 Peugeot 202 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,133 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Peugeot 202 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Peugeot 202 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Peugeot | Smart |
| Model | 202 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1133 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 81.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 2700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 1870 mm |
