1946 Peugeot 202 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1001 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Peugeot 202. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Peugeot 202 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
Model | 202 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1133 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2423 mm |