1946 Renault Juva vs. 2010 Opel Combo
To start off, 2010 Opel Combo is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1946 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1946 Renault Juva.
Because 1946 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Renault Juva | 2010 Opel Combo | |
Make | Renault | Opel |
Model | Juva | Combo |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2720 mm |