1946 Simca 5 vs. 1953 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1953 Singer SM 1500 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Singer SM 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Singer SM 1500 (57 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1946 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Singer SM 1500 should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Singer SM 1500 weights approximately 624 kg more than 1946 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Simca 5 | 1953 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Simca | Singer |
Model | 5 | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1946 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 570 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 14 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2740 mm |