1946 Simca 5 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1946 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 823 kg more than 1946 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Simca 5 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Simca | Mazda |
| Model | 5 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 570 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 14 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1383 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 4506 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1471 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2639 mm |
