1946 Skoda Polular 995 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Skoda Polular 995. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Skoda Polular 995 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1946 Skoda Polular 995. (22 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1946 Skoda Polular 995.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Skoda Polular 995 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Skoda | Ford |
| Model | Polular 995 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 995 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1684 mm |
