1946 Triumph 1800 vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 468 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Triumph 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Triumph 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Triumph 1800 | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Triumph | Cadillac |
| Model | 1800 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1774 cc | 2792 cc |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
