1946 Triumph 1800 vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 1946 Triumph 1800. (64 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1946 Triumph 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1575 kg more than 1946 Triumph 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Triumph 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1946 Triumph 1800 | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Triumph | Cadillac |
Model | 1800 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1774 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 403 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 2667 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |