1946 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 285 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Volvo PV 60 | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Volvo | BMW |
| Model | PV 60 | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 2171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2450 mm |
