1946 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Bravo (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2010 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1946 Volvo PV 60 | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Volvo | Fiat |
| Model | PV 60 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1946 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1435 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2610 mm |
