1946 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2011 Citroen C3

To start off, 2011 Citroen C3 is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1946 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Volvo PV 60 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1946 Volvo PV 60 should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 507 kg more than 2011 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1946 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 1946 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1946 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: