1946 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia

To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1946 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2012 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Toyota Sequoia has automatic transmission and 1946 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1946 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Toyota Sequoia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: