1946 Volvo PV 60 vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage

To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 405 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 155 kg more than 1946 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Aston Martin Virage has automatic transmission and 1946 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1946 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Aston Martin Virage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: