1947 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1993 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1993 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Alfa Romeo 164 (207 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1993 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 6C | 164 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2959 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 1506 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 70 L |
