1947 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,327 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe (269 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 784 kg more than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1947 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2950 mm |