1947 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 6C | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2710 mm |