1947 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1014 kg more than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jeep |
| Model | 6C | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1947 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 100 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 2520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 78 L |
