1947 Allard J1 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Allard J1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Allard J1 would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1947 Allard J1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1947 Allard J1. (100 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1947 Allard J1.
Because 1947 Allard J1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Allard J1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1947 Allard J1 (305 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1947 Allard J1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Allard J1 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | J1 | 3 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3917 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 55 L |