1947 Allard K1 vs. 2000 BMW Z9
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Allard K1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Allard K1 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1947 Allard K1. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1947 Allard K1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 BMW Z9 (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Allard K1. (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2000 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Allard K1.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Allard K1 | 2000 BMW Z9 | |
Make | Allard | BMW |
Model | K1 | Z9 |
Year Released | 1947 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3110 mm |