1947 Austin 16 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 860 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Austin | Simca |
Model | 16 | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1947 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2250 mm |