1947 Austin 16 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 795 kg more than 1947 Austin 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin 16 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 16 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |
