1947 Austin 16 vs. 1972 Rover P5B

To start off, 1972 Rover P5B is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover P5B (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover P5B weights approximately 310 kg more than 1947 Austin 16. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1972 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16. 1972 Rover P5B has automatic transmission and 1947 Austin 16 has manual transmission. 1947 Austin 16 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rover P5B will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: