1947 Austin 16 vs. 1972 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1972 Toyota Corona is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,253 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Toyota Corona (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1972 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Toyota Corona (166 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1972 Toyota Corona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
1947 Austin 16 | 1972 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 16 | Corona |
Year Released | 1947 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2590 mm |