1947 Austin 16 vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 98 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1947 Austin 16. (146 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1947 Austin 16.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin 16 | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | 16 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1182 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2640 mm |
