1947 Austin 16 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1947 Austin 16. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1947 Austin 16.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Austin 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1947 Austin 16 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | 16 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1947 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4690 mm |
